Defending to be a Freemason

by RmOlano
30Jun10

Taking a chance to join in beating up a very dead horse, this issue came up numbers of years ago in this forum. One of the wisdom imparted to the young man was a reminder that marriage is about partnership, about trusting and respecting other belief and opinion, making allowances to each other errors--- in short making the union work. If the other half is being force to "defend" something that the other half believe is important then, we could only speculate where this trend could stop. Defending why a 32" LED flat screen is better than 54" plasma or SUV rather than family van? There are things that a man could tell his wife, girl friend, or fiancée to just trust him and in the same token, there are things that she could say the same. If this fundamental ingredient is absent i.e. lack of trust then the young man has more important issue to resolve. Without doubt, that the Craft will still be around when he is truly ready to knock as all brothers and fellows have done who have gone that way before.

One lesson we can learn from Mosaic Pavement is the presence of opposite colors on a level plain. It could be interpreted as symbolized notion of the presence of opposite views or beliefs. They are out in the open and co-exist under the canopy of Heaven where all Masons work. The significance of tiles laid side-by-side, level, its placement, and usage during ritual work are well calculated to inculcate in the mind of novitiate that the ceremonies of Masonic Degrees are intended and hoped to make deep and lasting impression. It is unnecessary to recapitulate events that non-initiates would not understand. The point of this long-winded thought is the concept of agreeing to disagree. For those who are members of this group for sometime the subject is a very dead horse. I understand why some do not see it that way. Even a light from the same source when it passed through a prism of our choice would yield different shades of colors. If we substitute prism as experience then we can correlate “shades of colors” as opinions and/or beliefs. There is no right or wrong, just different view from different vantage point.

Not to belittle or offend the intelligence of uninitiated, even regularly made Masons could not come to agreement on how to define Freemasonry. Freemasonry can be defined in many different ways. It is like defining beauty--- it is in the eye of beholder. For some it is a good old boy network, some see it as social group, some it is a mystic circle and some perceived it as making good men a better man. As the definitions numbered as almost the same as its members world wide, how anyone can “defend” something he does not even experienced or even know yet?

If we subscribed with Brother Albert Pike definition of the Craft as “a system of morality, veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols,” one need to know the symbols first before grasping what it mean to him, to his brethren, and to the world around him. This study as our young Brother is now embarked is a life long endeavor. The journey is bisected with trials and tribulations over the rough and rugged road—it is not always easy. It will take time therefore; it is wise to allow the time and patience to run its course. The journey is not for anybody else, it is always for the traveler--- to build his own temple not made by hands eternal in Heaven. The answer to the inquiries at the door can only truly answered by responses coming from the candidate’s heart. Am I duly and truly prepared? Of what I am in search of? If the object is to be able to wear a ring with square and compass to impress those who can, then just buy the ring and be done with it. If someone need permission or to “defend” himself to join a group of good men trying to be a better man—then someone need to think again as to why he wanted to be one. Freemasonry is not for everybody.

...

To Widows and Orphans

Words will never describe,

soft counsel to ears might not be enough.

Hand shake or hug might capture some warmth

but no one will never really feel your pain

until each of us went through the experience ourselves.

Our Order reminds us of the hourglass

to watch the grains of sand passing through the portal of time.

no matter how many honors and accomplishments each of us achieved

our sand will keep on pouring until nothing is left behind.

The lecture in the second section taught us that the hourglass is not a symbol of time

Further Light and Lessons of the Craft reminds us that unlike time

Life is finite.

So Mote It Be

To Widows and Orphans

/rmo

28Jul07

Knocking

By Rudy Olano
15July06

“The idea that an organization would recognize everyone and every faith as equal and as a brother or that while they are praying the one next to them is sending praise to another God or differently perceived God is simply blasphemy.”

Your inquiry whether the preceding statement is correct in regards to complaints against the Fraternity can be viewed as partially correct. Our Craft is composed of multitude of men who joined for multitude of reasons. Brethren stayed, left and come back for motivation as diverse as the number of membership throughout the world. If you allow me to hazard an opinion, the statement was not the first time it was used to rationalize for dropping off from active participation and a bullet to discredit our Order.

“The idea that an organization would recognize everyone and every faith as equal and as a brother or that while they are praying the one next to them is sending praise to another God or differently perceived God is simply (blasphemy) a Tenet Freemasonry.”

“The idea that an organization would recognize everyone and every faith as equal and as a brother or that while they are praying the one next to them is sending praise to another God or differently perceived God is simply (blasphemy) a religious tolerance.”

Changing the last word with “a Tenet of Freemasonry” to be an accurate statement, will not change or entice those who left and those who cling to their dogmatic belief. Moreover, replacing the last word with “a religious tolerance” will still not make a difference with those who left and those with deep-seated passion of what other people should believe. Fundamentalists exist in every faith including Christians. This is a reason why some well established organized religious entities have some rather perplexing issues against Freemasonry.

If you allow me to remove the word “all” in the last paragraph of your original posting, I would agree in that nicely composed thought. Your description of what the Fraternity means to you is a very good vision especially coming from one who is not yet a member. Hold on that thought for it will serve you right whether you are a Mason or not. What you described is a notion that every human being in this planet ought to consider---- a nebulous dream in our time but then again we mortals can only dream of such things.

Don’t be annoyed if no one rushes to your doorstep or shoot a priority email to your basket. Remember that it is you who is asking a favor and not the other way around. Although through your writing, you seem to be in a right frame of mind to be considered for investigation. You will be contacted in due time. I will leave you with words that are familiar to all the Brethren of the Craft and who knows, that you might hear it again someday, “ …wait the time with patience…”

...

On Joining

by RmOlano

5Jul09

It is true that variations exist between jurisdictions and Brother Fred captured the most common American way or mechanics of petitioning to receive degrees in mainstream Freemasonry. Let us not get wrapped around the axle in discussing who and what non-”mainstream” Freemasonry are nor the asking as recruiting as these are separate topics by itself. The subject is about joining the Fraternity because of "wanting to emulate a great man."

Great number of past and present Brethren petitioned to receive degrees of the Craft for the same great number of reasons e.g. self-improvement, philosophical, family tradition, mysticism, networking, and yes, even "mercenary motives." The people who made up of the Craft are as diverse as the reasons of petitioning therefore, if one would look closely one would find chinks in Masonic armor. Many true and worthy Brothers are/were attracted for the same reason as stated by the inquirer. It is not surprising as in most likelihood, these true and worthy Brother Masons are the stamina of the raison d'être why the Fraternity exists for sometime. These are the individuals who comprehend that Freemasonry is not about carrying dues card in their wallet, possessing signet ring nor bumper stickers with square and compass. These are the Brethren who by the abiding the Tenets of Freemasonry made significant impact to younger generation thereby planting the seed of future true and worthy Brother of the Craft. To them past and present, we owe them respect and gratitude.

In American system of membership protocol, the inquirer already had a jump start as he was asked if he wanted to be a Mason. This is a significant revelation that will certainly be wrestled by investigating committee. Nevertheless, for over a decade of contemplating what it takes to "join," the inquirer was probably surprised that all it take to get started is to simply --- ask.

One doesn’t have to be a Mason to be a good man. Many religious entities will attest to this statement therefore, being a Mason to give respect to someone is NOT a valid reason to be a true and worthy Brother of the Craft. Ideally, one knocks on the door of Freemasonry because of his own free will and accord not because of any other reason(s) however noble or appreciative sounding motivation it might be. There are pledges to be made, actions to be scrutinized, obligations to be met --- Freemasonry is not just a Fraternity. To be a true and worthy Mason is not supposed to be measured in how many degrees completed, decorations embroidered on apron or jewels hanging on the neck. Being a Mason doesn’t necessarily meant good person. It simply meant a mortal being traveling through rough and rugged road of life toward the Ark anchored within the sheltered harbor there to finally unload the baggage of imperfection known as human flaws. Freemasons do not own nor monopolize the road to illumination.

Albert Pike wrote in 1888, that Freemasonry “is a system of morality veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols.” If I may be allowed to paraphrase a well respected and wise Mason who once wrote that “one join a Lodge not Freemasonry.” The Past Master of Benjamin B. French Lodge No. 15 in Washington DC, Brother Ken Giballa was pointing out that Freemasonry is more than a group of individuals with same interest--- it is an ideal that “makes good men a better man.” There are pre-qualifications to be fulfilled and one doesn’t become true and worthy Brother of the Craft on the account of joining the group. One doesn’t have to be a Mason to be a good man but it requires good man to be a true and worthy Mason.

To Bill L, if you want to honor your grandfather, continue to be a good man and petition to join a Lodge only because you wanted to not because of your grandfather. The Craft and your role model will indeed understand what you meant to say or do. Ask yourself what are you really looking for --- what are you in search of that you think you'll find within the circumference of a notion known as Freemasonry? What came you here to do? Only one person can truly answer that question and he won't be your role model.

...

Division Among Brethren

by RmOlano

22Mar09

Before we indulged ourselves with ever familiar self-flagellation, let us consider that division among Brethren especially in Grand Lodge level political arena is not confined to the Philippines and undoubtedly not a Filipino invention. What can be noted is that the political environment of certain Grand Lodge is a reflection of the existing governmental apparatus where political connection is the name of the game. An environment that espouses manipulation by few elite to advance the welfare of anointed padrinos and squashing those who dared to raise their voices or cry for justice is a preordained eventuality. This scenario is not a new issue. As my grandmother used to say, “lumang tugtugin na iyan” i.e. it’s an old song.

I concurred with the idea of multiple Grand Lodges co-existing and truly practicing the tenets of our Craft. If multiple Lodges can exists in one building, why it is so hard to practice tolerance at “higher” Grand Lodge level? Fear of losing power, prestige, and for some, access to annual dues is a worldwide issue not just to certain locality.

“Why only one Grand Lodge can exist in the Philippines? Why not? Removing the prejudicial thinking of the motive, be it may imagine or reality, Freemasonry spread around the world not because a Grand Lodge “authorized” the creation of another Grand Lodge but because three or more Lodges banded together and formed their own. Neither Modern nor Ancient Grand Lodges of England authorizes the creation of Grand Lodge of New York or Pennsylvania or California to form Nevada.” Why Not.

For Brethren who are interested in history of Philippine Masonry, it is fitting to suggest and give consideration to the point of view of the Brethren who don’t believe in Andrew Jackson’s “To the victors belong the spoils” in regards to Masonic history of the Philippines. History of Supremo Consejo del Grado 33 Para Filipinas.

Serious student of history will discern that an American-sponsored Grand Lodge in the Philippines has many advantages in the aftermath of pacification campaign during "Philippine Insurrection." Not only that the American Grand Master could keep tab on subordinate Lodges but can expect members loyalty to American influenced/brand of Freemasonry. One doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out the threat (imagined or real) of groups of former "insurrectionists" which includes "rebel" General Emilio Aguinaldo meeting regularly in secured venues. General Douglas MacArthur was quoted that Freemasonry is a useful tool to pacify Japan by adopting Freemasonry for Japanese men. One should not have to guess who was "patron" General/Viceroy/saint of Grand Lodge of Japan.

Geo-political issues aside, it is a fact that in large cities, multiple Lodges does exist and meet in the same building. It is a fact that if there is truly harmony within, multiple Masonic Lodges are not needed nor justified. Lodges that meets members expectations will flourish and Lodges that don’t will and indeed slowly fade away. This scenario is also applicable to Grand Lodges. Those with substance will endure hardship and tribulation regardless of how rough and rugged road the travel offers while buildings not made from "good, true, and square work" will not last for so long. “Time, patience, and perseverance will accomplish all things.”

There are those who define Freemasonry as a Fraternity of select few hence, embrace the concept of them or us while there are those who view the Craft as a moral system reserved only for male gender. And there are some who are trying to reach into the darkness of their own soul to seek a glimmer of hope that the Order is path toward illumination to immortality. The Brethren will define and see Freemasonry through the filters of each own choosing therefore, division among men and Brothers are expected among mortals. One could hope that there is enough sand in the hourglass to realize the fallacy of vanity and embrace the joy of tolerance among creatures --- big or small.

...

Who Are We

by Rudy Olano
Lincoln Lodge No. 34 (Phil)
Hanford Lodge No. 279 (CA)
2005

“A Mason is sometimes asked by a friend, a neighbor, or a business associate, "What do the Masons do?" The question may be worded more generally, "What are the Masons?"

The opening sentence of an article titled, What’s Your Answer brought out a fundamental question that been asked since time immemorial --- Who are we? The unknown author's real question to the readers was that do we know what Freemasonry is really all about. For what purpose it exist? Who are we? The article's last paragraph offers good and timely suggestions and should be good enough to satisfy normal and curious person. The piece offers adequate and standard explanation of the Fraternity however; its explanation is obviously directed to the non-masons.

Being a member of the Craft, we could ask ourselves, what are some of the specific lessons or Mysteries we study in the Lodge? We all know "the mystic ceremonies that were regularly developed and illustrated. They are intended and hoped to make a deep and lasting impression to our mind." But let's not talk in general terms and instead identify a specific example.

In one of the lectures, our attention is especially directed to the study of Geometry. As one and the most important of the seven liberal arts and sciences, Geometry treats of the power and properties in magnitude in general. This science enabled the architects, generals, engineers, geographers and astronomers to do their job.

A non Fellow Craft Mason will read and understand that the previous paragraph is about angles, measurements, and numbers. By knowing the formula to calculate the hypotenuse, a strong and well designed superstructure can be constructed. But for those who have already passed through a long aisle or porch, the letter "G" stands for more important implication. It is not tremendously difficult to correlate the Geometry materials mentioned in the lecture with the real meaning of "G." A point is the beginning of all geometrical matters. From a point to a line, from a line to..., etc. Without basic understanding of the science of Geometry, construction of stellar edifices is not possible. If one does not recognized his Creator, building one's temple not made by hands but eternal in Heaven is also an unattainable. This is only a fraction of the lessons or mysteries of Freemasonry.

Masonry is a system of morality, veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols. Masonry is not about community service like Lions or Rotary Clubs; it is not about business development like local Chamber of Commerce; certainly not a specific religious denomination support group. While those endeavors are noble and worth of time, they are not the focus of the Fraternity. They are the result of one's understanding of the lessons of Freemasonry. Someone said that the real secret of Freemasonry is making a good man a better man.

Who are we? I would like to leave that question not for friends, neighbors or business associates but for us--- the members of the Craft.

...

Masonic Clubs

by RmOlano
Hanford Lodge No. 279 (CA)
12Feb06 (Snow Storm Charles)

With the exception of Masonic Clubs in places where there are no Masonic Lodges exists such as in Diego Garcia, Bahrain, UAE and other places, possibly drawn by something lacking in their own Lodge, the brethrens often finds Masonic Clubs attractive for many reasons. Non masons such as wife, girl friends, co-workers can attend, semi-formal gathering, lunch break activity, etc.. are some of the unique atmosphere that makes it appealing. However, for brethren who cannot find time to attend the stated meeting or degree works, it seems strange to find one’s availability of spending time in Masonic Club. We all heard the complaints about boring meetings, long monotonous degree works, but yet brethren found moment to attend and enjoy their Masonic Clubs. The question we could then ask is what makes our brethren forgo the regular Lodge and choose Masonic Clubs instead? What makes physicians, carpenters, police, firefighters, college friends or brethren with same nationality form their own group and separate themselves from the rest? Is this a human reaction to circle the wagon for mutual defense or a tint of elitist corporeal and mental faculty to flaunt around?

No one, especially this writer contends that Masonic Clubs should be banned. No one in their right mind living in a democratic system of government would ever come close of proposing that idea. As it was said before with the exception of places where regular Masonic Lodges are not established, Masonic Clubs does offer a competition for the most valuable commodities of man--- time. And here lies the challenge to our regular Lodges, the leadership must offer something that would attract their membership back. Every man is unique and prudently must be treated individually. However, given that multitude of reasons can be given as an excuse for dropping off, human beings looks for the appreciation for the contribution of his particular skill(s). The honest acceptance in a voluntary group might be the key for holding his interest.

Do we really believe that because the District Inspector mandated that all Lodge Officers must attend the School of Instruction was the reason why brethren attend such events? Brethren showed up because they like to be there. They enjoy the company and looks forward to the evening of camaraderie. Masonry is a voluntary activity, no rules nor do solemn obligations make its members stay active other than him. No implied or direct threats from anybody even from Grand Lodge itself will make individual Mason to “like” to participate and “enjoy” in Masonic activities.

In the context of brethren participation to both, one can draw a notion that the proliferation of Masonic Clubs is an indication of something is eroding and vanishing from the local Lodges. The time honored rituals and its accompanying lessons in Freemasonry are not obviously being work in Masonic Clubs. Therefore, it could be argued that many other Craft illustrations and Masonic etiquette were not given emphasis thus were not practiced. We are living in a time of fast-foods, ATM, cell phones where time, distances were non-issue and human-machine interactions were just part of normal way of life. The Lodge is a rare place where civilities are expected during its transaction of business. When properly done, time stand still during opening and closing rituals. The actions and words spoken in the rituals within the Lodge convey Mysteries in Freemasonry---Lessons in Life. Masonic Clubs conduct its business like other organizations such as Lions, Rotary Clubs and the likes. While they have worthy causes and aims, the Craft encompass more than they could offer.

This article is not about putting culpability on Masonic Clubs for “taking away” brethren’s time from the regular Lodge but rather provoking a thought for brethren members of the club. As a member of the Craft, what are we truly seeking which could be found in place beyond our regular Lodge? Of what are we in search of ?

...

Immortality

by Rudy Olano
2Dec06

“…reading so much about the Craft makes me think so much, gives me new ideas, new questions!...the Craft a place where a good man can debate all this things?”– a question of a friend

First I want to congratulate you in accomplishments so far, I know you will go a long way, distinguished, and successful, just keep that spirit of doing the best you can, not for its intrinsic value but because that is the right thing to do. Romania will be grateful to your future contributions.

I can sense that you are reading Lomas and Knight Hiram books. Although both authors have such lengthy credentials, I have a real hard time of accepting that they found the mummy of Hiram Abif, of their conclusion of Grand Master DeMolay’s image on the Shroud of Turin concocted by Leonardo DaVinci and other things which some people commented as result of “fluffy logic.”

I tend to side with the Templar theory even before I petitioned to York Rite. This idea was borne of personal readings, amateurish research, and own deductive reasoning buttressed by my own version of “fluffy logic.” I know this revelation could draw some comments from a law student reader from Serbia. As mentioned before, people will see what their eyes want to see. We will put filters of our own choosing thereby seeing different colors from the same source.

If you remember a year ago when you gave me an advice which I truly cherished, I responded by saying that I am so proud of the fact that we came into full circle. It’s now you giving wisdom to someone who seems like losing his way. I am grateful and pleased that all the time we corresponded were not to idle our time away but resulted of having my padewan to come up with fortitude to offer an advice to the little green guy. Possessing wisdom is not directly related to the age, it is directly proportional to the number of same experience and accepted results. I don’t have to cite an example as you will noticed that fools comes in all ages, genders, and statutes however, sages also appears in the same fashion.

Our ancient and honorable Fraternity used many symbols to convey messages. In 1888, Albert Pike wrote in response to Albert Mackey’s Landmarks or Unwritten Law, “It (Freemasonry) is a system of morality, veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols.” There are many symbols of Freemasonry; most are plainly displayed to public who generally don’t pay attention to its origin. As an example, the States of Utah and Pennsylvania used beehive and keystone respectively for their highway signs. Beehive is Utah’s official State Seal while Pennsylvania is also known as “Keystone State.” Although beehive is a known Masonic symbol to a Master Mason, the keystone is a familiar sight for York Rite Masons while to the public those are the State signs for industry and for key role in holding the Nation’s unity. It is no coincidence that the men who were pivotal to the creation and existence of both States were members of the Craft.

The line of thinking relative to true origin of the Craft and its unpleasant by-product is again clouding your thought. Hundreds if not thousand of books had been written and being written by distinguished and undistinguished authors which at the end of the day, all will be classified as speculations. No one in our lifetime will ever answer your question, the lapse of time and physical milieu works against us---mortals who seek the real “truth.” Somebody asked you this questions before, would it really makes a difference if you found out the question you been seeking? Would the exposure of origin of the Craft make you change your decorum during the course of human experience called living? Finally, let us take for granted that after superhuman effort and tremendous time and resources expended for research and analysis that you personally found the answer, my question is that what you will do with it--- keep it for yourself or share it to the world who either don’t care or treat it as trivia? The Craft will go on as long as there are good men willing to learn how to be a better man. How the Order originated will be a subject of folklores, speculations and hypothesis for as long as there are people interested in the subject. If this is your fire breathing dragon then my friend, I bade you good hunting and send my regards to the Don.

There are intriguing ideas in your series of questions. What is time, after life, relationship of time and space. A very fascinating lady from Canada informed me sometime ago of her years of study in quantum physics and asked my thought of the same subjects. Since no one came back from the other side, and yours truly is lacking of first hand understanding on the subject, the issue is still open. Immortality is another status coveted by those who want to be remembered. The basic fact is that as mortals, the human experience is terminated at the grave --- it is over. Leaving a legacy whether it’s a physical object such as monument, bridge, or a gravestone, maybe books, painting, an ideal or a Nation, as long a those who were left behind remembers -— that is immortality. Good as well as bad deeds could make one an immortal. The choice depends on those cares to be remembered or being immortal.

Is there a place in the Craft where you can talk about the subject you termed as “crazy ideas?” I am sure that you will find Brethren who are interested with the same issues. Let me however remind you that the Craft is composed of multitude of good men with different agenda, from sharing grill cooking techniques, quail hunting, to meaning of life. The Craft per se is not a place to debate your interest but it is an organization where you can expect civility and decorum. Within the confines of the Brotherhood you will eventually find those who wear the same lens, looking at the same light from the same source.

Once I exchanged conversation with a truly worthy Brother in his driveway up until 2 o’clock in the morning. Despite of my concern of overstaying, he was genuinely glad every time I dropped in and talk with him for hours at the time. It’s been a year since he dropped his working tools but I can still felt the warmth of his hug when my daughter and I said goodbye the day we left California for a cross country drive here in Connecticut. I can still remember his chuckle, his humming of an old western song while driving us to visit other Lodges, and that early morning hours chat in his driveway. You even took time to write a sentence thanking the Worshipful Brother Bryan you never met or heard before --- that my friend, is immortality.

*** posted during 20Dec08 snow storm @ CT.

...

Knowing A Mason

by RmOlano

20Sep08

"How may we know a man to be a Mason?"-- a Brother asked

How do we may know indeed! On our way to qualification to the next level of illumination within the Craft, we are taught to commit to memory certain parts of the ritual. Some jurisdiction resorted to what is termed as short form thereby, allowing candidates to miss golden opportunities to digest many lessons contained within the long form. It seems that the popular stated reason to deviate from what was used to be the normal practice is about the inconvenience to the length of time a candidate to advance to the degree of Master Mason. For some reason, this writer does not comprehend the cause and impetus the rush to make someone a Master Mason as if we are engaged in a competitive race. We had witness instances where the lecturer would breeze through his spiel leaving the candidate with glazed look like a deer-looking-to-headlight and wonder what hit him. Compound this event with at least an hour of monologue without visual references and mixed it with archaic terminologies is a recipe of a sensory and memory overload.

It is something to watch and hear the candidate response to our elderly Brothers as to the candidate thought about the recently completed ceremony. It is normal expectation that most of the time a polite response will be given to an inquiry that touched majority of human emotion. Blindfolded therefore, darkness, the feeling helplessness, one’s dependency to unfamiliar person, fear to the unknown, feeling the cold sharp instrument and its implied promise of risk are some standard concern being played within the candidate mind which is the raison d'être of the ritual. It is mighty hard to answer such a question with detailed analysis on the spot. Most of us would simply blurt out something like, impressive, never been through that before or other superlative adjective that would reward the inquirer a smile in his face. A smile that usually meant, a confirmation that the night event was not a waste of time for someone did appreciate the labor of our Brethren. That same smile for some is a confirmation that the conferring team generated enough curiosity to this fellow that someday hopefully he will be a part of the tradition of inculcating others the ritual of the Craft. It is always a hope since time immemorial that out of many, few will carry on the work of the Craft, out of many, some would remain and understand what those archaic words, figures, and symbols intended. Understanding such mysteries signifies familiarity, contemplation, and testing that hypothesis is part of a process for illumination.

How may we know a man to be a Mason? The customary answer taken from the long form proficiency requirement would be about if someone knew the word, sign, token and posses personal virtues of a decent and moral man such temperance, fortitude, prudence and justice. The first three answers are the most popular and overused gateway in determining if a man is a Mason. The dues card, handshake, password, car decal, t-shirt and others like things are one interpretation of what is Freemasonry. There is nothing wrong with this understanding; it is within the definition of the Fraternity. In order to practice Brotherhood, members have to know his Brothers! To be a part of a group of society certain things have to be demanded and expected to be returned. Being one of them requires losing a part of me.

The last part of identity requirement is the often times skipped portion. This line of thinking subscribed to Brother Albert Pike’s 1888 definition of Freemasonry --- “a system of morality, veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols.” Notwithstanding, the physiological terms e.g. throat, arms, hands and feet, to symbolize the cardinal virtues of a Mason, what makes man a Mason is his awareness to this litmus test. It is not only Mason’s mere understanding but of his daily attempt to restrain his passion from “allurements of vice,” of a his “steady purpose of mind” in face of expediency of the moment, of his virtue to live and act “to the dictates of reasons,” and adhering to “that standard or boundary of right which enables us to render unto every man his just due, without distinction.” Temperance, Fortitude, Prudence, and Justice. Our appendages might convey friendly welcome but if certain sounds come from the bowels of our throat express otherwise, the embrace became a façade for the benefit of the crowd. Just as speech can be confirmed with body language, what makes real is the equilibrium of all body parts. What makes a man a Mason is finding the balance of what is expected and what can be humanly accomplished. There is no perfect Mason in this world and to those who claimed to be one --- “let him cast the first stone.” Asserting to be a Mason is not a hard endeavor, living to be one is always a challenge and knowing one is an art by itself.

...

Secrets of the Craft

by Rudy Olano
11Jul06

If there is a secret to be known in our Fraternity, it is the fact that we have no secret worthy of exchange of anybody --Mason or non-Masons life. If the post is referring to the "lost word" since all Master Masons were told of the "secret" substitute of the Lost Master's word, one can find that in Royal Arch Degree in York Rite. Once he knew of that which we are in search of --- he might be surprised that it is not really a secret after all. If our Brother is talking about our rituals, all someone has to do is to type "Duncan Rituals" in any Internet search engines or buy that book on any book store. Those are not secret anymore. It is pointless to pretend there are or is a secret when reality states otherwise

Veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols. There are lessons in our Craft that are NOT to be taken literally. The hourglass is not about time keeping instrument equivalent to modern watch but it represents human life. The scythe is supposed to be the symbol of time yet the lecture was about death. This why studying lectures, symbols and allegories in our Craft are fascinating. In delving into the lessons of the Craft the number one lesson is not to take anything on its face value. There are meaning(s) behind the symbols, letters, figures and characters--- representations of a message.

Our rituals including obligations were the relics of the past; those were our links to the Craft's rich heritage of the by-gone days. Old or ancient maybe but they are worth keeping since they meant something which teaches us that Freemasonry is a study of science of morality, veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols. Deciphering or revealing the meanings of symbols and allegories contained in the series of Degrees is what the students of the Craft are studying for. To open up the knowledge we could use for constructing a building not made by hands eternal in heaven. "Secrets" or morality lessons we could share with our fellow human beings for our collective benefit which hopefully makes this world a better place to live. Those are lessons or lights in Freemasonry that needs to be shared and not kept as secrets

From operative to speculative, from solving mathematical problems to philosophical issues, even distinguished Masonic scholars were at odds in describing what is Freemasonry. If this humble writer could hazard an opinion, viewing Freemasonry is similar to defining beauty. What viewers see will depend on many things including what the eyes want to see. Demanding for further light is of no use if the eyes remain close not to mention distortion of light waves if selected filter is involved. Some of us ended our search for that which was lost in the Royal Arch degree. Maybe because we believe that the search was about Faith. For those who did not waver in their Faith, it is beyond that—something filtered through the calibrated prism of his choosing. People wears different lenses, different filters. Some found their Truth by wearing their shades and discovered peace within their own temple, while some continue to remain on their steed to hunt the fire-breathing dragon or to seek out for their own personal version of Holy Grail.

There is no argument about the lessons veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols. The challenge has always been deciphering those lessons but more important is the application of those what we discovered. Those are the "secrets" that this traveler seeks. Lessons that could make good men a better man who in the process positively influences everything in his path. ---lessons that could be use to the betterment of this world. Lessons that should be shared and not kept as secrets.

...

Election Grand Style

by RmOlano
11Dec06

Questions and Truth.
Instead of writing separate responses to offline emails with same topic, allow me to post my thoughts in regards to your inquiries through this medium of pinoymasons group.

I never meet nor heard of Bro Jimmy Gonzales until I saw his entry to the guestbook. Some of you vouched for his character and qualification which I don’t doubt to be true. I was taken back by the statement posted not only to a different jurisdiction (Arizona) but in Internet as well. We are talking about an election process here and for someone to openly say that one will be elected was a powerful statement of a very confident person. I guess I am expecting some resemblance of humility from those who will or aspiring be entrusted to wield power.

Let us get the facts and avoid the hearsays and speculation as to what is the intent or reason of the message. Certainly, I will not even delve into "correctness" or otherwise, as some hypothesized from previous postings.

Fact 1: Whoever signed the guestbook declared with certain confidence that the election result is already preordained as in "will be."

Fact 2: There was no caveat in the statement as in "maybe," or "if." It is a done deal.

Fact 3: The statement was true since the Brother was elected and the current Deputy Grand Master of GLP.

Election is a process where a vote is to be caste by qualified individual. A motion could be made to have the Secretary cast a unanimous vote BUT anybody could dissent to such motion or have the option to leave and refuse to participate. We could argue that the motion is rather polished way of ensuring the continuity of those who are serving or on-line. I do not agree on this method as it defeats the meaning of the word "election" but that is acceptable and that's how our system works. Not all Junior Wardens automatically assumed the next higher chair due to various reasons, non-qualification, withdrawal, political moves, etc. which is normally manifested by being NOT elected.

Talking about politics, the same good old boys network is alive even within our Order and to deny this fact will never change an iota of reality. Our Order is still composed of men---though flawed but still striving to be a better man. This is a fact of life not borne of speculation which brings us to the topic of truth. Often time's truth hurts and normal people avoid pain, we rather pat ourselves in the back and sing kumbaya while praising each other how good we are. Pity for those who bring discomfort by asking relevant questions, nine lashes for those who bring pain by soliciting for changes, and brand them as not loyalist or even clandestine as if the judges themselves never had spots on their purple aprons.

Some of you asked pointed question such as change in the process, some of you boldly raised issues on electoral change, some wonders what will happen if the research contradicts the current practice, my Brothers there are group of Masons who asked the same questions and concerns, they are now branded as "clandestine."However, if you are just lambasting the powers that be, you'll just a received a copy of poem about don't question your boss or you can get hell out of Dodge because you are a pain in the ass.

...

Masonic Symbols

By RmOlano
17 June 2005



In Nov 2004, The MW Reynold S. Fajardo, PGM, Grand Secretary of GLP wrote an article titled The Philippine Flag-its Masonic Roots which is currently posted in the website of the Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon. View the excellent historical resource and appreciate the Masonic influence not only to the flag which symbolizes the Filipino nation but also the struggle for independence led by our brethren of the Revolution.


In the aftermath of a recent popular movie, the subject of the Masonic influence or conspiracy, depending on which side the readers is on, again raised the consciousness of the public. With equal regularity, the meaning of the All-seeing Eye on top of the unfinished pyramid printed on the one dollar US bill became the focus of those entities that are not too friendly with the Craft. An excellent article by S. Brent Morris, PM, Eye in the Pyramid published in the Short Talk of Masonic Service Association of North America, gave us the a brief historical data of the of creation of the US Great Seal and the Masons use of All-seeing Eye symbol. The article was a snippet of a historical articles of both US and our Craft and a must read for all students of Freemasonry. WB Morris concluded that the Eye of the Providence and the Masons All-Seeing Eye are the same representation of the Divine Omnipotence. That the symbols shared the same meaning therefore, its use was not necessarily motivated or dominated by Masonic ideal. The belief in a Supreme Being is not proprietary right of the Fraternity.


Freemasonry is a progressive moral science taught by degrees; it is veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols. Symbols could be defined as something that represents something else such as emblems or signs. Some of the emblems mentioned in our lectures which, most of the time are given a cursory wish to be familiar with at a later time. In our contemporary era where consideration for ticking time gave way to the oral explanation of symbols of our Craft, the newly advanced brethren were instructed to seek the monitor and study its meaning. The same concern for time often times resulted in the opposite effect. With time in mind the following symbols illustrated in the Master Mason lecture are being enumerated as a reminder for our contemporary brothers that Masonry symbols goes beyond the Square and Compass.


a. The Three Steps are emblematical of the three principal stages of human life.

b. The Pot of Incense is symbol of pure heart which is always a suitable gift to the Deity.

c. The Beehive reminded us that man was formed for social and active life. Although independent for all other things, mankind is dependent to each other for protection and security.

d. The Book of Constitution guarded by the Tyler Sword reminds us to be watchful and guard our thoughts, words and action.

e. The Sword Pointing to a Naked Heart is an illustration for us to realize that justice will sooner or later overtake us.

f. The All-seeing Eye is a constant reminder that although our thoughts, words and actions maybe hidden from the eyes of man, He pervades the innermost recesses of the human heart.

g. The Anchor and Ark are representation of mans sanctuary from earthly life. Together it alludes to that divine vessel moored safely in a peaceful harbor which provides sanctuary and rest to the weary travelers of time.

h. The Forty-seventh Problem of Euclid teaches us to be general lovers of the arts and sciences.

i. The Hour-Glass is an emblem of human life. A powerful reminder of how swiftly the sands run, and how rapidly our lives are drawing to a close!

j. The Scythe is an emblem of time, which cuts the brittle thread of life, and launches us into eternity. When the sands within the hourglass dropped its last grain so as we must soon be cut down by the all-devouring Scythe of Time and be gathered into the land where our fathers have gone before us.



There are group of emblems that can not be discussed in public and are reserved to elucidation of the brethren of the Craft. However, it is suffice to say that emblems of mortality and immortality were equally visible to the searching eyes. The undertaking to search for message of symbols of Masonry is also a quest for the answer to the proverbial question of --- What is Freemasonry?

...

Not A High Point

RmOlano
13Apr08


the following are excerpts from postings before and after being banned from a Filipino Masonic discussion group:

“Anyone is free to leave the fraternity or this group if one feels that it no longer fits his views” because “we are always governed by certain rules which we abide.” But before someone pick up his marbles and leave to tell mother that there are bullies in the playground, let me ask for clarification of seemingly well thought “to prevent animosity it was decided not to identify a brother belonging to a certain jurisdiction.” Who was the “it” that made the decision? Did the moderators got together and agreed to this idea or maybe the group was consulted for their opinions and concurred that this is the right thing to do for the benefit of the group? Or this is another example of what the VW Jim Best posted earlier, “This smacks of the same dictatorial policy the immediate Past Grand Master was accused of...”

While it is true that we all come to this group on “our own freewill and accord” but that does not give anyone a license to shove anything to member’s throat. This is not an example of a notion we all proud to flaunt around. Quoting Bro Baltazar of Oceanside-San Dieguito No. 381 earlier post, “This is not Freemasonry to me”--- that would be interesting item on T-shirts and most especially on a banner.

Despite of what happened, I am still holding my ground that the group is not connected or in the words of a Brother "front of iGLP." The recent petty ruling of site owner that can be best summarized by VW Jim Best as "dictatorial" comment has the intent of preserving harmony within the group by burying ones head in the hole so to speak. It has a good intention but was poorly conceived, assessed as well as dismally executed.

As I mentioned to VW Ben Apacible, I wish the unfortunate incident did not torpedoed what he is laboring ever since the schism finally exploded. I am urging the Brother to reconsider his feelings regarding IGLPI Brethren. They are OUR Brothers of the Craft regardless of how some in GLP distorted the real meaning of "clandestine."

For a site that is so proud or being loud about "Brotherly Love," the recent experience with the group was certainly not a high point of being a Filipino Freemason.

...

UNIVERSAL MASONRY

by RmOlano
16May06

In an article titled Universal Masonry, by the MW Brother Conrad Hahn, PGM, Deputy Executive Secretary of Masonic Service Association, he elucidated the rough and rugged road towards the realization of what he calls a Universal Masonry. In it, he gave us some of the historical facts related to the fraternal recognition practices between Grand Lodges and Grand Orients. The MW correctly stated that not all Freemasons are “free” to communicate with other brethren not” recognized” by their own governing body called Grand Lodge/Orients. Although the removal of the requirement for a belief in a Supreme Being was a popular excuse of withdrawing the “recognition” to other Masonic Lodges, the same old myopic excuse of racial bigotry is rarely mentioned. A student of the craft don’t have to seek far to be confronted with fraternal relationship issue with Prince Hall Lodges. The notion of Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God is somehow became a rhetorical quest for definition of Man and God.

Somewhat interesting is the silent response to the accolades bestowed to deeds committed by Freemasons whether “regular” or “clandestine.” It seems like that we Freemasons do not feel obligated to inform the general public of the difference. When the occasion for laurel wreath of victory to rest upon the head, or hang jewels to fit the diadem, we seems to forget the affiliation of famous black brother from Prince Hall Lodge or the Grand Orient Lodge membership of brother revolutionary General. Another case in point is the fact that Freemasons under the jurisdiction of Spanish Grand Orient initiated the Philippine Revolution. The “Masonically inspired and lead revolution,” Bro. Emilio Aguinaldo, the first President of the Philippines was referring to was not due to the Freemasons under the jurisdiction of various Grand Lodges from United States. Grand Orient Lodges were already established in the Philippines before the creation of the Grand Lodge of the Philippines which calls Grand Lodge of California as its Mother Grand Lodge. Under the pretext of being "different" these proud (rightly so) Lodges were declared “clandestine.” All "regular" Masons are prohibited to engage in any Masonic communications with "irregular" Masons. The notion of Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God is somehow became a rhetorical quest for definition of “standard” Freemasonry.

MW Hahn exhorted the readers to continue dream of “a universal Masonry, a universal Brotherhood of Man, without undermining the one common and universal aspiration of the fraternity which has appealed to men in every age and climate. The Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God is the universal dream of men of good will everywhere who call themselves Masons. To abandon that dream is to abandon Freemasonry. To abolish those tenets is to abolish Freemasonry. A Mason must dream if he is to continue his speculative building. A universal Masonry? Keep dreaming and building; it's on its way!”

Our Craft was created by men who united by a common desire developed a method of study called Freemasonry which can be defined as a progressive moral science taught by degrees and as Bro Albert Pike written, "a system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols." Freemasons came from the same stock of men who saddled with human weakness tend to slide back to the slippery slope of creature existence. The Craft is not perfect as it was and still is composed of men. Men who still struggle to find peace within him. Men who knew that someday when his "weary feet shall come to the end of his toilsome journey and from nerveless grasp shall drop forever the working tools of life" --- hope that the "record of his life and action shall be as pure and spotless" as his lambskin apron. Men who dreams to hear the welcome words, “Well done my faithful servant; enter thou to the joy of the Lord.” The spirit of Universal Masonry can also be found in a sociological entity called--- religion. The notion of Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God is now became a rhetorical quest for a question ---- a Universal religion?

*** printed in first publication of IGPI Journal, November 2008. ***

...

Black Cube Reject

by Rudy Olano
Hanford Lodge No. 279
11June06

Numerous articles and debates about the “Tyranny of the Black Cube" has been on going for sometime, along with other issues such as regularity of certain "brand" of Freemasonry, women, spawning of breakaways "Grand Lodges," etc. The current system of one negative overruling the majority of positive votes was adopted with a thought of preserving harmony within the Lodge in particular and the Fraternity in general. A candidate that is acceptable by all members of the Lodge not by some or portion thereof is a key and major contributor to the continuing vitality of the Craft.

Granted that investigation has been conducted and recommendations were signed by members of the Lodge but as long as the rule of “black cube reject" endures, the Lodge must honor this time honored tradition. We have been participant of multiple elections of the same candidate on the same meeting to "ensure there was not a mistake" and/or subjected to a "raised voiced" from the East questioning the integrity of the unknown brother who caste the offending vote. When harmony of the Lodge is being disturbed because of a nonmember/candidate, one begins to ask the brotherhood aspect of the Lodge. A petitioner desire over a brother's feeling or thought about somebody wanting "to participate in our privileges?"

An indication of concern if not a flat out rejection by a non-member of a Lodge is to my opinion a separate subject by itself. This is a case of a non acceptance of a single member that overruled the majority. The dissention cannot be generally classified as an abuse but rather an exercise of a Brother’s right not privilege as or if stated in each Lodge constitution. Abuse could also come from implied pressure from others who also have their own agenda. Be it may a friend, relative or simply a true worthy candidate, campaigning to sway the direction of vote is to my myopic opinion does not deserve a time and place within the Lodge. Each of us regardless of current or past office can only cast one ballot; raising tenor from the august chair can only add cloud to otherwise simple affair.

Each Brother must be given a chance to formulate his own decision. Let him step in the center of the mosaic pavement, conduct his business and have peace in his resolve. Each of us is given a chance in full view of every one present to voice what is in our heart. In front of three Great Lights, everyone acknowledge what he is about to do. The sign signifies the acceptance of his responsibilities and wish to forthcoming events. To abuse the solemnity of the proceeding shows the roughness of still unpolished stone. Rough ashlar hoping to be a polished/perfect ashlar someday. If the Fraternity decided to disregard his vote, are we implying to get different stone rather than polishing what we already started?

Our Craft will continue to exist not because of quantity but of the quality. There are traditions worth keeping and I believe the Craft should keep this one.

...

For Men's Only

by RmOlano
24Feb08rev1

In 1888 response to Albert Mackey's Landmarks, Albert Pike wrote that Freemasonry's "true definition is that it is a system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols." Like defining beauty, Freemasonry can be seen, and interpreted in many ways limited only to the eyes of beholders. Some it can be a social or fraternal group, for others it can be a way of life. If we subscribed to the notion that this Craft is about social interaction then there is a merit in grouping the members according to gender. Specific or mixed does makes sense as long as nobody is forced to join a group, be it may specific or combination thereof. If men can form our own group then women should have all the rights to form their own. While “mixed company” has its merits and roadblocks, in my own myopic view, it will take time for the mainstream Freemasons to accept this format. We don’t have to look far to see the present issues the Fraternity is dealing with all-male Fraternity let alone all-female Masonic Lodges.

Although we are witnessing some progress or at least not outright refusal to acknowledge the existence of the regularity of all-female Freemasonry, it is amazing to be an eyewitness of some Brethren who albeit their position and stature within the Fraternity continue to defy the very same Tenets of the Craft. In our lecture, we are reminded that Justice is “that standard or boundary of right which enables us to render unto every man his just due, without distinction.” Without understanding justice how can we find Truth, which brings to the dilemma of the kind of Brotherly Love we practice if we are hoodwinked from the Truth?

Freemasonry does change. It was said to evolve from operative to speculative. Operative, from actual builders of magnificent edifices to memorialize human offerings to Deity to speculative---we are now erecting “temples not made by hands.” The Fraternity was also postulated to originate from all male warrior-monks---Templar nevertheless, in our contemporary times; defending ones faith is not a gender selective domain. The Degree of Master Mason was relatively “new” addition. The institution of Grand Lodge is also a change. Even the popular square and compass as Masonic emblem was a result of change. As to our Obligation, it seems strange to hold ourselves only to selected part because we abhorred a portion thereof. We all know that like all other corporeal part of the Craft, the Obligation which some of us hold so dearly is also but a symbol of the Freemasonry. Something not to be taken literally but to interpret and study it as one of the Mysteries/Lessons of the Craft.

If we see the Craft through Albert Pikes vision in 1888 that the ideal is about "building a temple not made by hands, but eternal in heaven," who in this world can claim that the notion of practicing morality and improving oneself through Freemasonry is only reserved for male gender? Who can rightfully claim that the slogan "making good men to a better man" only applies to human being classified as male? What can be used as a reference or justification that only man is allowed, "to improve himself in Masonry?"

Ms Laurel Bergren recently inquired what makes her gender be not worthy to learn the “secret” of subduing passion and improving oneself through Masonry. Is there any Justice and Truth that only male can practice the “system of morality veiled in allegories and illustrated by symbols?” Like Ms Bergren, I am waiting for someone to answer her question, “Are women any less deserving of God’s Grace?”

I commend the Brother from GLNY for a very nice exposition of the fallacy of self-induce masculine superiority complex. Having acknowledged the intrinsic advantage of women with “far greater extent than men of our species ever will have,” then in a round-about way the answer to Ms. Bergren question is obviously "No, women are not less deserving of God's Grace."

Having that issue settled, we then can continue to discuss Bro/Doc Paul original article of "Why Masonry should remain a men’s club." As WB Ken noted, the crux of the dialogue is not about women joining male Masonic Lodges but facing the inquiry of why it seems strange to many Brethren to allow the opposite gender to practice a “system of morality veiled with allegories and illustrated by symbols?”

To non-Masons especially to women who are reading this exchange of opinions, the hollowness of speaking about men’s task to protect and nurture that “God gift” to humanity is undeniably transparent. Anyone who views Freemasonry as a way of life will be hard pressed to defend this issue unless one would take a myopic view that Freemasonry is nothing but a “good old boy” network masquerading as fraternity.

Let us not kid ourselves that even with long years of the Craft existence, there are still members of the Craft who don’t recognize other duly made Masons because the colors of the skin, religious belief, jurisdiction territorial jealousy, and other petty excuses. Before we really start tooting our own horn, let us look deeply into our heart and ask the question---what are we really in search of? And maybe in the bowels of darkness buried deep within the crypt of cold calculating human emotion, we can find a flicker of light just enough to understand what the word “tolerance” really meant.

...

On Recognition

By RmOlano

22Feb08

In 1922, Bro. Oliver D. Street, Senior Grand Warden and Chairman of Committee for Foreign Correspondence, Grand Lodge of Alabama speech before Bessemer Lodge No. 458 said,

“We read in our Monitors and in the effusions of Masonic orators of the "Universality of Masonry," and how that Masonry "unites men of every country, sect and opinion." We are told that ....Masons are everywhere, ready to make themselves known by the familiar words, signs and tokens and to extend succor and relief even at the peril of their own lives....we belong to so beneficial and so universal a brotherhood. It is a beautiful fiction which it is pity to destroy, but lamentable fact is there is not a word of truth in it."

The illustrious Brother then talked about “The intolerance on the part of many Masons and Masonic Bodies towards others claiming to be Masonic is so extreme that they frown even on the suggestion of getting acquainted or of even conferring together."

It is amazing to read the concluding remark from the Chairman of the committee, which investigates and recommends which Grand Lodges should Grand Lodge of Alabama, extends its fraternal recognition.

"Finally, we must rid ourselves of the self-righteous idea that by having any communication or association with Mason or Masonic bodies not already recognized as regular, we render ourselves unclean. We will not be hurt Masonically, socially or morally by meeting and discussing Masonry with men whom we may never recognize as Masons.”

Although the above article was published in 1946 book, Little Masonic Library Book 1 with introductory remarks by Carl H. Claudy, PGM, the message still rings the bells of relevance in our contemporary times. While times change, despite of inroads created in fostering social changes with view of more understanding and tolerance between human beings, there are ideas and habits that will take more time to be accepted. As ordinary humans ordinarily inhabited our Craft, it should not be surprising to see human flaws among us. Nevertheless such limitation should not stop the Brethren from realizing what Albert Pike wanted us to discern --- eloquently suggested in Mark Stavish’s book , “Freemasonry: Rituals, symbols and History of the Secret Society,“ ---- the great secret of Freemasonry, clothed in the alchemical language of the Knight of the Sun.”

...

Like Religion

by RmOlano
onboard Delta flight 1518
19Dec07

"... it is so far interwoven with religion as to lay us under the obligation to pay that rational homage to Deity which constitute our duty, our happiness ..."

Religious but not religion. Where do we draw the line or do we have to? Religion like politics are not to be discussed within the lodge as it was proven fact these subjects are so divisive that it frequently disrupts the peace and harmony among the Brethren. Despite of such admonishing, history of the nations are littered with names of men who were linked to the Craft. Nation building aside from economics issue is one of the factors hence, a synonym for political aspiration and key ingredient in the struggle. Politics is the arena for the leaders while religion is the notion that ordinary folks from time immemorial would fight and die for. The ability to convince the followers to do something not for leader's benefit or for the group, but to some form of Heavenly reward is a tried and true tactics/method of successful leaders.

What constitutes religion? Religion in classical term comprises of belief to a notion of existence of Higher Being(s), standard practices or rituals performed by the leaders and the group for the benefit of both sides and an understanding that obedience to the prescribed actions or reactions will be looked upon as show of fidelity hence, worthy of the covenant. It is important to consider what constitute this belief in the context that would take into account other than Christian view. It is indeed very easy to make a comment what is and what is not when we close our mind to already formulated conviction. My God is better than yours, my religion offer more for less effort. My God is better than yours for we have to do more hence, shows more faith than yours. My belief is better than yours for we devote our whole life praising our God. Same end game with different mode of travel.

What if a belief is about acknowledgment of the existence of Supreme Being who for a reason wont call Him by His Name not just out of respect but because for a simple reason that the Name is truly unknown? What if a principle does perform their standard practices or rituals not because of they are required by their legal constitution but because they are an integral part of the organization? What if this system does have a hierarchal organization that supervises the proper conduct of the rituals and performance by their priests? What if believers or members does truly trust that participation, either by going through or actively participating in the act of the standard practice/ritual, along with adhering to the teachings of the tenets that a Heavenly reward is therefore expected--- just like any religion. What if this belief grows so strong and confident that it dabbles into a system of governance or politics with the high hope of providing secular mixed with theological living condition for general population---just like some religion? And just like any religion, when its members were persecuted by both political and religious orders for what they believed in, will this concept or system be also called religion?

If not, why we can’t call it as such? What could be the main or real reason other than “just because it is not?” Is it because their priests did not go through the same school and training their priests undergone? But how would other religious order could prescribe training of priests from different belief? Would lack of so-called formal training for the priests makes this religion non-religion? If we looked into material aspect, even some recognized religion does not even own a building where they could gather and exercise their belief. With basic necessities satisfied, it is impressive to watch the phenomenon of social denial. It is reminiscent of the societal acceptance of existence of Santa Claus, Easter bunny rabbit which for some religion is a pagan idea or as in Christian tradition that Christmas is being celebrated during winter. Despite of the physical, historical, and other evidences or lack thereof, the common rationale is that it is the spirit of such events that really matters.

So, if we subscribed with this reason that the essence or “spirit of such event that really matters” is the key for public acceptance, why would the above notion or system is not considered religion if all the basic requirements are present? Could it be the answer is that because the members who practice such belief themselves won’t call it as such--- a religion. And why not? Was it because the members are instructed during the early indoctrination, that it was not? Could it be the reason why majority of the leaders won’t recognize that the system is a form of belief is because of expected political and other religious order backlash as a manifestation of hard lesson learned? Or is it because the members and the public are all in agreement to engaged in a collective phenomenon of social denial in reminiscent of easter bunny rabbit, effects of global warming and in the spirit of this season, Santa Claus? An interesting issue indeed but depending which side the believer is on, the issue is serious and not serious enough to question the very essence of the belief --- just like religion.

...

Note: See the October 9, 2007 article published by The Pew Forum "Court Says Freemasons Fall Under Religious Protection Law." /rmo31Dec07.